Claimbrook

Home › Vehicles › Chevrolet › Equinox › 2013

Model-year public record

2013 Chevrolet Equinox

Recall campaigns, owner reports, crash-test ratings, and fuel economy in one place. Organized so you can understand what the numbers do and do not mean.

2distinct recall campaigns
987owner-submitted reports
4NHTSA overall score
22 MPGofficial combined economy

Safety campaigns

Recall history, campaign by campaign

Campaign year comes from NHTSA's report-received date. The distinct-campaign list is complete for this source snapshot.

2 campaigns
!A campaign listed for this model year does not prove that a particular vehicle is affected or unrepaired. Check the full VIN with NHTSA or a dealer before acting.
2016 report

Visibility — Windshield Wiper/Washer — Motor

Campaign ID: 16V582000 (official)

Filed on August 4, 2016 · Owner notice on April 13, 2017 · Official scope: 367,808 vehicles campaign-wide

2016 report

Electrical System — Ignition · Power Train — Automatic Transmission — Control Module (Tcm/Pcm/Tecm)

Campaign ID: 16V502000 (official)

Filed on July 5, 2016 · Owner notice on October 14, 2016 · Official scope: 8,367 vehicles campaign-wide

Source: NHTSA recall records. Potential-unit counts can include other models and years.

Consumer reports

What owners reported

These are allegations submitted to NHTSA, not verified defects or findings.

#
987 total owner reports
C
31 reports mention a crash · 3.1%
F
10 reports mention a fire · 1.0%

One report can mention both a crash and a fire. Counts do not measure failure rates because the exposed-vehicle population is not provided here.

Crash testing

NHTSA safety ratings

Ratings summarize controlled crash and rollover tests for listed configurations of this model year.

4
Overall rating

Five stars is NHTSA's highest score.

Frontal4 / 5
Side5 / 5
Rollover4 / 5
What this means: More stars indicate lower injury risk in NHTSA's standardized tests. The rating applies to tested configurations—not one vehicle's maintenance, tires, damage, or current condition.

Source: NHTSA NCAP · 2 listed test configurations.

Efficiency

Fuel economy at a glance

Averages across 8 listed configurations. Your trim, drivetrain, fuel, and driving conditions can differ.

City driving Comparison scope: 15–26 MPG for context
Combined Comparison scope: 16–29 MPG for context
Highway driving Comparison scope: 18–34 MPG for context
2875/yearofficial published annual fuel cost

Each gauge is positioned within the source minimum and maximum for the same model year, represented EPA class, and primary fuel—not an arbitrary universal maximum. Comparison scope: EPA class count: 2; primary fuel type count: 1. FuelEconomy.gov cost assumptions are not a prediction of actual spending.

Source: FuelEconomy.gov · Economy range for this vehicle: 19–26 MPG.